Employee ADA Access and Reasonable Accommodations Policy
This policy was posted for public comment from January 29 – February 13, 2024.
Comments
My comments are due to this statement here under miscellaneous. "Allergies and fear of service animals (dogs or miniature horses) are not valid reasons for refusing to allow employees to bring a service animal into a college facility. " I have allergies to fur which triggers my asthma. I would not immediately object to a service animal due to allergies, but if I started having breathing episodes and allergic reactions, despite using my medications, what would be my avenue to improve my work environment? Would I need to then get my own ADA accommodation because the work environment would limit my life activity of breathing? I would expect there to be at least a mention of an avenue due to allergies (or maybe even fear if it is debilitating and causes anxiety) to pursue to find a solution for all parties. Otherwise, I could expect the person who is having an allergic reaction to feel unwelcome and potentially look elsewhere for employment. |
In D. 4. a. 2- There has been a lack of clarity for both employees and supervisors on when it is a reasonable accommodation to be considered for reassignment and what conditions need to be present in the accommodation, working conditions, and the vacant assignments for this to be something considered. Either this policy or a published and shared procedure process needs to outline this process better. Also, in several spots it mentions that the accommodations cannot cause an undue hardship. How is this evaluated? For some areas a modified schedule could be a hardship, the ability to work remotely vs in person, etc. How is this evaluated, transparent, and consistent? For I- Special Pregnancy Related Accommodations- How does nursing or pumping mothers factor into this? If it doesn't where does it? |
In 4.a.2, one of the options is, "reassignment to a vacant position." Could an employee be asked to take a demotion or lower pay based on this wording? |
Definitions
|
Responses
In several places, that policy mentions that the accommodations cannot cause an undue hardship. For some areas a modified schedule could be a hardship, the ability to work remotely vs in person, etc. How is this evaluated, transparent, and consistent?
Each accommodation request is considered and evaluated through an interactive process on a case-by-case basis. The interactive process is as transparent as possible while maintaining the employee's privacy and confidentiality.
Definitions (section 3)
“Auxiliary aids and services” is specific terminology included in the ADA. This term covers a broad range of different aids and services. In 4.D.4.a.(3), the phrase “auxiliary aids and services” has been hyperlinked to an ada.gov resource that discusses them in detail.
No changes were made in response to this comment.
No changes were made in response to this comment.
Suggestion accepted. The last sentence from definition 3.F has been moved to section 4.D.3.a.(2).
This definition has been revised to state, “a modification, adjustment, or change made in the policy, practice, environment, or procedure to provide individuals with disabilities equal access to employment opportunities and enable their participation in programs, services, or activities.”
Revision accepted.
Revision accepted.
Reporting Discrimination Against Individuals with Disabilities (4.B)
Section 4.B. outlines the procedures for how employees who believe they have been discriminated against because of a disability can file a complaint at the college. Maintaining an exhaustive list of agencies with current contact information is difficult, especially within a policy. The EO Office can refer employees to other offices, such as UALD or EEOC, as needed.
Requesting Reasonable Accommodations and Parties’ Duties (4.C)
No changes have been made in response to this comment. Employees must submit an online Employee Accommodation Request form to engage in the accommodation process. They can consult with the FML/ADA coordinator in person, by mail, telephone, or email in addition to submitting the form.
No changes have been made in response to this comment. There is currently no such email. If one is created in the future, this can be revisited.
Revision accepted.
No changes have been made in response to this comment. When an employee submits the electronic Employee Accommodation Request form, they provide authorization for PWC to contact their health provider(s). The ADA requires that accommodation requests be addressed in a timely manner. The reasonable accommodation process cannot be fully addressed until the FML/ADA Coordinator has all the relevant documentation. Documentation is often provided by entities aside from the employee. This makes it difficult to ascribe a specific timeline of a set number of days after the employee submits their documentation.
Thank you for your comment. This is outside the purview of the committee. Your comment will be forwarded to the appropriate department.
Review and Determination of Employee Accommodation Requests (4.D)
Revision accepted.
Revision accepted.
Revision accepted.
Section 4.D.4.a(2) – There has been a lack of clarity for both employees and supervisors on when it is a reasonable accommodation to be considered for reassignment and what conditions need to be present in the accommodation, working conditions, and the vacant assignments for this to be something considered. Suggestion that either this policy or a published and shared procedure process needs to outline this process better. Suggestion to delete the words “or reassignment to a vacant position” from 4.D.4.a(2).
The interactive process to determine accommodations takes into consideration that the reasonable accommodation must be fair and equitable. Although demotion can be a reasonable accommodation under the ADA, this is a case-by-case process.
4.D.4.b.(1) has been revised to read, “The FML/ADA coordinator’s determination must be in writing and specify the reasonable accommodations being provided to the employee or why an accommodation is denied or partially denied.”
Appeal of Accommodation Determination (4.E)
Revision accepted.
Revision accepted.
No changes have been made based on this comment. Considering all the individuals involved in the committee, the desire to review all supporting documentation, the potential need to consult with non-committee members (the FML/ADA coordinator, supervisor, or employee), and the importance of the decision, 20 calendar days is reasonable.
Service Animals (4.F)
The ADA specifies that allergies and fear of dogs are not valid reasons for denying access or refusing service to people using service animals. That said, each accommodation request is considered and evaluated through an interactive process on a case-by-case basis. An employee impacted by a service animal in their work environment should reach out to the ADA coordinator to work through the concern.
Revision accepted.
Confidentiality (4.G)
No changes have been made in response to this comment. 4.G already addresses confidentiality and privacy, emphasizing that “an employee's reasonable accommodation, medical condition, and medical history shall be kept confidential.” Employee medical information is very rarely released to a supervisor. Supervisors would be responsible for maintaining confidentiality under section 4.G.
4.G.3 has been revised, “employees with a duty to investigate compliance with the ADA shall be provided relevant information upon request.”
Sections H.1&2 both include hyperlinks to the same parking maps. Suggest going with the hyperlink on H.2.
Revision accepted.
In section 4.I, how does nursing or breast pumping for mothers factor into this section? If it doesn’t, where does it?
The Hours of Work & Scheduling Policy addresses these concerns (section IV.A.6).